ArticleBlood2025
Improved diagnostic screening and classification of clonal mast cell diseases by ultrasensitive KIT p.D816V detection.
Article in Blood, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- SuperRCA assay ofThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2026Article
- Predicting the clinical course of advanced systemic mastocytosis on treatment with avapritinib or midostaurin.Leukemia · 2026Article
- Article
- The REMA Score Revisited: An Optimized Algorithm for Early Prediction of Clonal Mast Cell Disease.Allergy · 2026Article
- Hereditary Alpha-Tryptasemia and Mastocytosis: What We Know and What We Need To Learn.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2026Review
- Emergency nursing care of a patient with acute appendicitis complicated by esomeprazole-induced anaphylactic shock: a case report.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Impact of Molecular Evaluations in the Biology, Diagnosis, and Prognostication of Patients With Mastocytosis.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractDetection of KIT p.D816V is a cornerstone in the diagnosis and classification of mast cell activation syndromes (MCAS) and mastocytosis. However, KIT p.D816V may be undetected due to a low mutated-cell burden in the blood and bone marrow (BM) of many patients, particularly those without skin lesions. These findings underscore the need for ultrasensitive molecular techniques for the detection of KIT p.D816V in these clinical settings. Here, we evaluated, to our knowledge, for the first time, the sensitivity and specificity of a novel Flow-SuperRCA KIT p.D816V assay, compared with conventional allele-specific oligonucleotide quantitative polymerase chain reaction (ASOqPCR), through the analysis of 548 blood and BM samples from 337 adult patients with MCAS and mastocytosis. Our results demonstrated greater sensitivity of the new technique vs ASOqPCR (limit of detection: 0.001% vs 0.01% variant allele frequency), with higher rates of positivity for KIT p.D816V in whole blood and/or BM of 64% of patients with monoclonal MCAS and 55% of patients with BM mastocytosis (P < .0001). Notably, the sensitivity of the new assay went beyond that of ASOqPCR in purified BM mast cells (P < .0001). Additionally, clonality was newly identified in 18% of patients previously diagnosed with nonclonal MCAS, who presented with a unique cutaneous MCA-related symptomatic profile. These results confirm the high specificity and ultrasensitivity of the Flow-SuperRCA assay for the detection of KIT p.D816V, emerging as a well-suited whole-blood and whole-BM test for diagnostic screening and classification of patients with MCAS and mastocytosis. These findings further highlight the clonal nature of an unprecedently high fraction of patients who presented with anaphylaxis and MCAS, with important pathogenic, diagnostic, and clinical implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.