Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40811824›Full record

ReviewJournal of occupational and environmental hygiene2025

Exploring the future of occupational safety research: A strategic foresight approach.

Jessica M K Streit, Sarah A Felknor, Nicole T Edwards, John J Howard

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jessica M K StreitOffice of Research Integration, Office of the Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Sarah A FelknorDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, Southwest Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, Texas.
Nicole T EdwardsOffice of Research Integration, Office of the Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
John J HowardOffice of the Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Washington, District of Columbia.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A team from the U.S. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health conducted a strategic foresight project to explore the future of occupational safety research (OSR). Data collected via systematic horizon scanning and key informant interviews were synthesized into six drivers of OSR change: (1) technological advancement, (2) partnerships and public trust, (3) prioritizing research investments, (4) safety and health integration, (5) data and science quality, and (6) worker protections. These drivers served as the basis for envisioning four potential OSR futures. Analysis of the resulting scenarios identified opportunities to enhance and advance OSR methods and approaches, innovation, systems thinking, interpersonal networks and connections, and the ethical application of scientific findings as we move into the future of work.

Indexed as

Occupational HealthResearchForecastingHumansNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S.United StatesFuture of workinnovationlong-term planningoccupational safetystrategic actionsystems thinking

Identifiers

PMID40811824
PMCPMC13186274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.