ArticleJMIR mental health2025
An Examination of Generative AI Response to Suicide Inquires: Content Analysis.
Article in JMIR mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- When Safe Responses Lead to Unsafe Conversations: Patient Safety and Accountability in Mental Health Artificial Intelligence-Based Applications.Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare · 2026Article
- Possible Role and Function of AI Conversational Agents in Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Borderline Personality Disorder: Qualitative Interview Study.JMIR mental health · 2026Article
- The AWARE (AI Use, Why, Attachment, Reality and Risk, and Effect on Functioning) Framework for Assessing Patients' Use of AI in Mental Health Care.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- A scoping review on the mental health harms of LLM-based chatbots.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- AI-Related Stress and Suicidal Tendencies in a Primary Care Cohort: Clinical Audit.Online journal of public health informatics · 2026Article
- Examining the Roles of Technology Across the Health Care Journey for Individuals With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Qualitative Interview Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Article
- Beyond social media: public health governance of artificial intelligence-based chatbots used by adolescents.European journal of public health · 2026Article
- Mapping Practice-Based Signals of Generative AI in Psychiatric Care: Qualitative Study of Korean Psychiatrists' Experiences, Interpretations, and Implementation Priorities.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Current themes of AI in mental health: Actionable evidence and guardrails for mood and anxiety care.Journal of mood and anxiety disorders · 2026Review
- Barriers and Facilitators to the Use of Large Language Model-Based Conversational Agents in Mental Healthcare: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Urgent considerations for suicide prevention in the safe and ethical use of artificial intelligence.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026Article
- Generative Artificial Intelligence as a Psychological Intervention: Between Illusion and Risk.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Head and Neck Surgical Oncology: A State-of-the-Art Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Mass Media Narratives of Psychiatric Adverse Events Associated With Generative AI Chatbots: Rapid Scoping Review.JMIR mental health · 2026Article
- Article
- Large language models in adolescent suicide prevention: from language signals to accountable action.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Are artificial intelligence chatbots safe for suicide risk assessment? A narratively synthesized review of current evidence.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2026Review
- Parental sexual health development support for emerging adolescents in western upstate New York: a qualitative interpretive description study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Cybersecurity and Privacy Risks of Generative AI Mental-Health Chatbots: A Systematic Review and Regulatory Framework.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Generative artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots are an online source of information consulted by adolescents to gain insight into mental health and wellness behaviors. However, the accuracy and content of generative AI responses to questions related to suicide have not been systematically investigated. Objective: This study aims to investigate general (not counseling-specific) generative AI chatbots' responses to questions regarding suicide. Methods: A content analysis was conducted of the responses of generative AI chatbots to questions about suicide. In phase 1 of the study, generative chatbots examined include: (1) Google Bard or Gemini; (2) Microsoft Bing or CoPilot; (3) ChatGPT 3.5 (OpenAI); and (4) Claude (Anthropic). In phase 2 of the study, additional generative chatbot responses were analyzed, which included Google Gemini, Claude 2 (Anthropic), xAI Grok 2, Mistral AI, and Meta AI (Meta Platforms). The two phases occurred a year apart. Results: Findings included a linguistic analysis of the authenticity and tone within the responses using the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count program. There was an increase in the depth and accuracy of the responses between phase 1 and phase 2 of the study. There is evidence that the responses by the generative AI chatbots were more comprehensive and responsive during phase 2 than phase 1. Specifically, the responses were found to provide more information regarding all aspects of suicide (eg, signs of suicide, lethality, resources, and ways to support those in crisis). Another difference noted in the responses between the first and second phases was the emphasis on the 988 suicide hotline number. Conclusions: While this dynamic information may be helpful for youth in need, the importance of individuals seeking help from a trained mental health professional remains. Further, generative AI algorithms related to suicide questions should be checked periodically to ensure best practices regarding suicide prevention are being communicated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.