Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40811804›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2025

Examining Potential Implicit Bias in Oncologist-Patient Communication (CONNECT): Protocol for an Observational 2-Site Study.

Veronica C K Duck, Marsha L Augustin, Jose A Morillo, Aviel N Alkon, Robert M Thomas, Brianna N Richardson, Lihua Li, Kathryn I Pollak, Cardinale B Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Veronica C K DuckDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8600-5640
Marsha L AugustinDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0009-0007-5027-6004
Jose A MorilloDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8978-3966
Aviel N AlkonDivision of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6341-134X
Robert M ThomasDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0009-0004-9203-9689
Brianna N RichardsonCancer Prevention and Control, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1326-0453
Lihua LiDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3154-9576
Kathryn I PollakDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5559-2416
Cardinale B SmithDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3635-8701

Funding

The Role of Implicit Bias on Outcomes of Patients with Advanced Solid CancersR01CA251547 · NCI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI SMITH, CARDINALE B · 2021 to 2025
$3.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA251547
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCompared with White patients, minoritized patients (Black and Hispanic patients) have a higher incidence of advanced solid cancers and have a higher mortality. These patients also report poor patient-centered communication and worse pain assessment and management. Although many factors contribute to these disparities, physician implicit bias may be a contributing factor.

objectiveThe primary goal of this study is to evaluate the role of implicit bias among oncologists and examine the impact on racial or ethnic differences in objective assessments of communication with minority patients with advanced cancer.

methodsTo accomplish this goal, we plan to recruit 65 oncologists and 325 patients (5 patients per oncologist) with advanced solid cancer from ambulatory cancer clinics within the diverse settings of the Mount Sinai Health System in New York City and the Duke University Health System in Durham, NC. We audio record patient-oncologist encounters during a postimaging visit, with 3 encounters for each of the patients. We will analyze the recorded visits and compare the patient-centered communication content of these conversations. Immediately after the recorded visit (no more than 2 weeks later, in order to minimize recall bias), patients are required to complete a follow-up survey to evaluate patient-centered outcomes. A 3-month follow-up survey is used to assess pain levels and control, use of analgesics, and psychological distress. A 6-month follow-up survey is used to assess psychological distress. We administer the Implicit Association Test to oncologists to assess their level of implicit bias toward patients who identify as Black or Hispanic after we finish recording patient encounters.

resultsFunding from the National Cancer Institute was received in March 2021. Patient and oncologist recruitment began in March 2022. We have recruited all 65 oncologists in the study, and patient recruitment is ongoing. The study team plans to continue to enroll patients until March 2025. As of December 2024, we have enrolled 245 patients. We expect to publish the findings in October 2026.

conclusionsIn this paper, we outline the study methods, describe the development of a codebook to assess pain conversations being used to evaluate primary and secondary outcomes, and discuss challenges and lessons learned throughout the study. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/66086.

Indexed as

CommunicationNeoplasmsOncologistsPhysician-Patient RelationsFemaleHumansMaleNew York CityObservational Studies as Topicaudio-recorded encounterscommunicationoncologist-patient communicationoncology

Identifiers

PMID40811804
PMCPMC12395106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.