ArticlePloS one2025
An investigation into the statistical precision attainable with a distribution-free method of constructing age-dependent reference centiles.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The distribution-free approach to the construction of age-dependent reference centiles which has been originally published by this author in 1995 and applied since then in a multitude of large-scale studies has never been investigated from a sample-size planning perspective. In the present paper, this gap is filled using the precision criterion introduced by Jennen-Steinmetz and Wellek (2005) for the estimation of reference centiles for quantitative diagnostic markers being independent of other variables, and extended by Jennen-Steinmetz (2014) to the study of age-dependent markers. In the age-dependent case, that criterion does not admit an exact representation as a function of the sample size, even when interest is in estimating a one-sided reference limit. Hence, all sample-size results presented here are based on Monte Carlo simulation. The computations cover a broad range of conditional distributions of the marker at given age including both symmetric and positively skewed distributions. For the relationship between the conditional standard deviation and age, a linear function of different slopes was assumed. Except for the most extreme settings investigated, the sample sizes shown in the tables summarizing our numerical results do not exceed the order of magnitude which has been available for a recent, potentially very influential reference-value study of basic parameters making-up the normal fetal growth profile. Furthermore, our results suggest that in terms of sample-size requirements, the distribution-free approach of Wellek & Merz (1995) to the construction of age-dependent reference ranges is typically a good bit more efficient than reference-range determination by means of quantile regression.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.