ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2026
Diagnostic Performance and Kinetics of Hepatitis E Viral RNA and IgM Antibody Test Positivity in a Genotype 1 Outbreak in South Sudan.
Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Guidelines for Hepatitis E Vaccination in India: An Expert Panel Consensus Report on the Recombinant Hepatitis E Vaccine, HEV 239.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Utilizing rapid diagnostic tests in infectious disease surveillance and response in humanitarian emergencies.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDiagnostics are essential for understanding hepatitis E epidemiology, but the field performance of available tests remains unclear. We evaluated the performance of polymerase chain reactions (PCR), IgM ELISA, and the Assure hepatitis E virus (HEV) IgM rapid diagnostic test (RDT) during a HEV genotype 1 outbreak and assessed the duration of viremia and antibodies responses.
methodsWe used data from enhanced surveillance at a health facility in Bentiu internally displaced persons camp, South Sudan (March-December 2022). As part of a vaccine effectiveness study, suspected hepatitis E cases underwent testing with all 3 diagnostics at enrollment with a follow-up sample. We used a latent class model to estimate test performance and accelerated failure time models to estimate time from jaundice onset to a negative test for PCR and ELISA. RESULTS AND
conclusionsAmong 893 suspected cases, test sensitivity declined with time from jaundice onset. Within 30 days of jaundice onset, PCR sensitivity was 73% (95% Credible Interval [CrI] 27, 90), compared to 86% for RDT (95% CrI: 74, 93), and 95% for ELISA (95% CrI: 91, 98). Specificity was high across tests: PCR at 98% (95% CrI: 98, 99), RDT at 95% (95% CrI: 93, 96), and ELISA at 95% (95% CrI: 93, 96). Median time from jaundice onset to negative test was 19 days (95% CI: 17, 21) for PCR and 113 days (95% CI: 87, 163) for ELISA. The Assure IgM RDT showed higher sensitivity for identifying hepatitis E than PCR and similar specificity to IgM ELISA, supporting its use in surveillance. Care seeking delays can greatly influence the interpretation of diagnostic tests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.