Long-Term Outcomes of Persistent Critical Illness.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Long-term survival of patients with persistent critical illness in Australia and New Zealand; a retrospective registry-based cohort study.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
   Article
2. Day-7 lactate-to-albumin ratio as a prognostic marker in sepsis patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation: a multicenter retrospective landmark analysis of the Korean Sepsis Alliance registry.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026
   Article
3. What's in a Name? The Ongoing Tangle of Chronic Critical Illness, Persistent Critical Illness, and Prolonged Acute Mechanical Ventilation.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  What's in a Name? The Ongoing Tangle of Chronic Critical Illness, Persistent Critical Illness, and Prolonged Acute Mechanical Ventilation.2025

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as