Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40811641›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental botany2026

Multiplication of peat moss (Sphagnum L.) species for climate action.

Juliana Parsons, Eva L Decker, Ralf Reski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Juliana ParsonsPlant Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6261-2342
Eva L DeckerPlant Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9151-1361
Ralf ReskiPlant Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5496-6711

Funding

Deutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftGerman Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture BMEL 22007216German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture BMEL 2221MT020BGermany's Excellence StrategyLower Saxony Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection 105-29213-2940/2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mosses from the genus Sphagnum have experienced 350 million years of evolution separate from all other mosses, resulting in distinctive features such as unlimited apical growth potential which is not seen in other mosses. Sphagnum mosses are ecosystem engineers and the main components of peatlands. Although peatlands cover only a small part of Earth's landmass, they store more carbon than all living matter combined. Peat mining and agriculture result in degraded peatlands and thus have a dramatic negative impact on our climate. Sphagnum farming is a promising approach to combat climate change. Here, we review state of the art research with a focus on the establishment of a peat moss collection and their growth in vitro, especially in photobioreactors. Axenic, monoclonal Sphagnum strains have been established from spore capsules that have been collected from different peatlands across Europe. Analyses with flow cytometry have revealed haploid as well as diploid accessions. Optimization of the media composition for several species has resulted in an up to 50-fold biomass increase in a photobioreactor process. Future work should employ transcriptomics for further optimization of biomass gain. Moreover, the importance of the Sphagnum microbiome should be considered for transplantation of the axenic, clonal moss material to open fields.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeSphagnopsidaClimateBiomass gainbiotechnologybryophyteclimate changeecosystemin-vitro culturepaludiculturepeatlandsphotobioreactorsphagnum farming

Identifiers

PMID40811641
PMCPMC13351734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.