ArticlePloS one2025
Analysis of adverse drug reactions in 507 cases of Tislelizumab: A real-world retrospective study based on data from Guangxi, China.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze the real-world characteristics and patterns of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with tislelizumab, providing valuable insights for clinical practice.
methodsWe conducted a comprehensive analysis of tislelizumab-related ADR reports within the pharmacovigilance system of Guangxi, China, spanning from 01/04/2021-31/08/2024. Our analysis focused on population characteristics, temporal distribution of ADR occurrences, system organ classes (SOCs) of serious adverse drug reactions (SADRs), profiles of major SOCs, and factors influencing SADRs and blood and lymphatic system disorders (BLSDs).
resultsThis study analyzed 507 tislelizumab ADR reports (698 events), including 282 SADRs (356 events), with no deaths reported. Pharmacists were the primary reporters (60.55% of reports). Most patients were aged 46-75 years (77.32%), male (72.58%), and of Han ethnicity (75.54%), and 1.78% (9/507) were of Zhuang ethnicity. A total of 86.19% of ADRs occurred within 30 days of medication. Among the SADRs, there were 83 PTs and 17 SOCs, with the most common SOCs being blood and lymphatic system disorders (15.47%, 108/698), investigations (14.90%, 104/698), hepatobiliary disorders (4.15%, 29/698), and skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (3.15%, 22/698). Logistic regression analysis showed that chemotherapy was a significant risk factor for SADRs (OR = 4.634, 95%CI: 2.871-7.917, P < 0.001). The risk of BLSDs - related ADRs was 5.545 times higher in the chemotherapy-incorporating group than in the monotherapy group (95%CI: 3.423-8.701, P < 0.001).
conclusionsClose monitoring, particularly in patients receiving chemotherapy-incorporating regimens, is crucial during the first 30 days post-tislelizumab treatment to manage SADR risks. Proactive measures should be implemented if SADR occur.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.