ArticlePloS one2025
Efficient federated learning via aggregation of base models.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Federated Learning (FL), as a distributed computing framework for training machine learning (ML) models, has garnered significant attention for its superior privacy protection. In typical FL, a subset of client models is randomly selected for aggregation in each iteration, which performs well when the data is independent and identically distributed (IID). However, in real-world scenarios, data is often non-independent and identically distributed (Non-IID). Random selection cannot capture knowledge from different data distributions, resulting in a global model with lower accuracy and slower convergence. To address this challenge, we propose base models, which are models with diverse data distributions on clients. By combining the parameters of these base models, we can approximate all client models. Meanwhile, we sufficiently demonstrate the existence of base models. Then we employ the evolutionary algorithm (EA) to identify base models on distributed clients by encoding client IDs and optimizing client selection through crossover, mutation, and other evolutionary operations. Our method addresses the issue of low efficiency in random selection. We conduct experiments on the FashionMNIST, MNIST, and TodayNews datasets, applying the proposed method to FL frameworks such as FedAvg, FedProx, and SCAFFOLD, all of which show superior performance and faster convergence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.