ArticlePloS one2025
Teacher acceptability of physically active learning in UK secondary schools - a mixed methods study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRoughly 70% of UK adolescents are insufficiently physically active, while secondary education reform is needed to improve adolescent wellbeing and 21st-century skill-building. One potential strategy to help address these areas is physically active learning (PAL), where movement is integrated into curricular lessons. In the UK, studies have largely focussed on primary schools; little is known about PAL in UK secondary schools. This study aimed to explore, using mixed-methods, UK secondary school teachers' acceptability of PAL, and their delivery preferences, perceived implementation barriers and facilitators.
methodsCross-sectional data were collected from UK secondary teachers via online survey (N = 75). In addition to descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U tests were conducted to examine differences by gender and school types (urban/rural, state-funded/independent), and Kruskal-Wallis tests for differences by subject. Qualitative data on teachers' current teaching practice, PAL acceptability, and perceived barriers and facilitators, collected through open survey questions (N = 63), and online teacher interviews (N = 7), were analysed using the framework method.
resultsUsing a scale of 1.0 (strong disagreement) to 5.0 (strong agreement), participants liked the concept of PAL (median 4.0, IQR 4.0,5.0) and would use PAL if it was school policy (median 4.0, IQR 3.5,5.0). Female participants were more certain that PAL should be implemented than male (U = 361.5, p = 0.04). Languages teachers found PAL appropriate for their subject more than humanities and social science teachers (U = 6, p = 0.01). Four main themes were generated: (1) 'It's time for a change'; (2) 'PAL seems like common sense'; (3) 'Is PAL realistic in secondary schools?' and (4) 'Recommendations for implementation', highlighting a collaborative approach.
conclusionsUK secondary teachers largely felt that PAL is a logical and enjoyable tool to contribute to education system improvement and can benefit pupils' wellbeing and learning, if appropriately executed. The findings can inform future research working towards sustainable PAL implementation in UK schools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.