Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40811491›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Exploring the addictive processes in repetitive self-harm through a grounded theory approach: "It always felt like a choice until it didn't".

Millie Witcher, Sarah Rowe, Sally Marlow, Jennifer Heath

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Critically Exploring Self-Harm Through Lived Experience Perspectives: A Survivor-Controlled Integrative Review Employing Participatory Methodology.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Millie WitcherDoctorate Programme in Clinical Psychology, School of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
Sarah RoweMental Health Sciences Programme, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1072-6182
Sally MarlowInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jennifer HeathDoctorate Programme in Clinical Psychology, School of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2630-7417

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is limited empirical research to suggest repetitive self-harm can be understood or conceptualised as an addictive behaviour. However, few empirical studies have investigated this and yielded conflicting results. This study aims to explore to what extent can repetitive self-harm be conceptualized as an addictive behaviour.

methodsThe study employed the principles of Constructivist Grounded Theory to guide the collection and analysis of data from 15 adults with current or past experience of repetitive self-harm.

resultsThirteen categories were identified within the data that depicted participants journeys with self-harm over time. 'Starting' to self-harm (category 1) and participants' description of 'needing to punish myself' (category 2) led to self-harm 'feeling addictive' (category 3). Once self-harm had become repetitive, 'having the urge to self-harm' (category 4) and experiencing a 'conflicting relationship with self-harm and self' was ongoing for participants (category 5). Throughout each incidence of self-harm, participants described a "cycle of self-harm", in which self-harm had different functions and consequences: 'managing emotions' (category 6), 'allowing me to function' (category 7), 'caring for myself' (category 8), 'controlling' (category 9) and 'feeling guilt and shame after self-harm' (category 10). All participants described 'responding to other's reactions' to their self-harm (category 11), six discussed 'breaking the self-harm cycle' (category 12) and six participants described 'relapsing' (category 13) and returning to self-harm following a period of abstinence.

conclusionThis study has provided a conceptual model of processes that maintain engagement in repetitive self-harm, discussed in relation to addiction literature. Clinical practice could consider working alongside the client to identify where they feel they are within the self-harm cycle in relation to changing their self-harm behaviours.

Indexed as

Behavior, AddictiveSelf-Injurious BehaviorAdultEmotionsFemaleGrounded TheoryHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40811491
PMCPMC12352750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.