ArticlePloS one2025
A disproportionality analysis of FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) events for methimazole and propylthiouracil.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMethimazole and propylthiouracil are the most common antithyroid drugs. We assessed the safety signals associated with methimazole and propylthiouracil by data mining the FDA pharmacovigilance database.
methodsData were retrieved from the FAERS database from the 1st quarter of 2004 through the 4th quarter of 2023. A disproportionate analysis of reporting advantage ratios was used to assess potential associations between adverse events and methimazole/propylthiouracil.
resultsA total of 17,379,609 reports were extracted, of which 5,317 cases of methimazole and 1,761 cases of propylthiouracil were classified as primary suspect reports. After combining the same primary ID, 1586 patients with methimazole and 446 patients with propylthiouracil were retained. We observed 8 categories of SOCs with a reported number ≥ 30 for methimazole and 12 categories of SOCs with a reported number ≥ 10 for propylthiouracil. The median time to adverse events in patients with methimazole was 31 days, with an interquartile range of 31-74 days. The median time to adverse events in patients with propylthiouracil was 90 days, with an interquartile range was 20-388.5 days.
conclusionOur study provided a more in-depth and extensive understanding of adverse events that may be associated with methimazole and propylthiouracil, which will help to reduce the risk of adverse events in the clinical treatment of methimazole and propylthiouracil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.