Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40811429›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2025

Decentralised trials for hearing and tinnitus therapies: Lessons from the Digital thErapy For Improved tiNnitus carE (DEFINE) randomised controlled trial.

Joseph Salem, Dhiraj Sharma, Amy Moore, Olivia Dantonio, Luke Twelves, Emma Ogburn, Michael Young, Jan Multmeier, Jameel Muzaffar, Matthew E Smith

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Joseph SalemUniveristy College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Dhiraj SharmaImperial College Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1191-9461
Amy MooreLindus Health, London, United Kingdom.
Olivia DantonioLindus Health, London, United Kingdom.
Luke TwelvesLindus Health, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9137-9727
Emma OgburnLindus Health, London, United Kingdom.
Michael YoungLindus Health, London, United Kingdom.
Jan MultmeierLindus Health, London, United Kingdom.
Jameel MuzaffarOto Health, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3065-0269
Matthew E SmithUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8147-1549

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for evaluating the efficacy of interventions; yet, traditional methods involving multiple recruitment sites often involve significant logistical and financial challenges. The DEFINE trial demonstrates the feasibility of a decentralised approach to RCTs by comparing smartphone-delivered self-guided tinnitus therapy against one-to-one therapist-facilitated treatment for tinnitus. This trial was conducted entirely remotely, leveraging digital technologies for remote recruitment, data collection, and intervention delivery. A total of 210 participants were recruited through social media platforms over a five-month period. Participants were screened and enrolled by a central trial team remotely, who utilised hearing test smartphone applications and electronic consent forms. Baseline and follow-up assessments were conducted using electronic data capture (EDC) platforms, with high retention rates observed at each time point. The trial successfully recruited and retained participants, demonstrating the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of remotely managed trials. Key findings include a high engagement rate from social media ads, with 151,978 impressions leading to 4,997 clicks (3.3%), with a direct advertising spend of £880. 912 individuals self-screened for eligibility online. The median age of participants was 58.3 years, in line with comparable traditionally-recruiting tinnitus studies, with good geographical distribution across the UK. The trial's adaptability allowed for protocol adjustments, and real-time monitoring of data quality and completeness. The DEFINE trial demonstrates that decentralised RCTs can offer a viable alternative to traditional RCTs for some hearing and tinnitus research, potentially increasing participant diversity and reducing the burden of research on participants, while maintaining rigorous standards of data collection and participant safety. Increasing clinical use of remote audiological assessment, and hearing implant programming provide increasing opportunities for the adoption of entirely remote or hybrid studies in hearing and tinnitus conditions.

Indexed as

TinnitusAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSmartphoneSocial MediaTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID40811429
PMCPMC12352653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.