ArticlePloS one2025
An assessment of optimizing biofuel yield percentage using K-fold integrated machine learning models for a sustainable future.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accelerating population and modernization has triggered a steady rise in energy demand and a significant rise in household waste, particularly municipal solid waste. In this context, waste-to-energy conversion has emerged as a sustainable solution. This study aims to maximize biofuel production yield using biomass-based banana peel catalyst waste by optimizing process parameters through machine learning models integrated with k-fold cross-validation. The models employed include Polynomial Regression (PR), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), and Linear Regression (LR). The three key input variables including reaction temperature (RT), catalyst concentration (CC), and methanol-to-oil molar ratio (MOR) were used to train and test the models, with biodiesel yield as the measured output. Among the models, PR emerged as the best-performing one for predicting biofuel yield, demonstrated by its high R² value of 0.956 and low error metrics (RMSE = 1.54 MSE = 2.39 MAE = 1.43). The best model was determined through balancing bias and variance across k-fold validation iterations, where PR exhibited the highest average R² value of 0.868. Furthermore, the optimized process parameters predicted by PR for maximum biofuel yield were a RT of 59°C, CC of 2.96%, and a MOR of 9.21, resulting in a yield of 95.38%. These findings contribute to advancing large-scale machine learning-driven biofuel optimization, supporting industrial waste-to-energy applications, and fostering sustainable energy development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.