ArticlePloS one2025
Weight loss journeys: Exploring social influences and determinants of health in an exploratory rural German intervention.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Themes of Reported Rural Healthcare Challenges Related to Non-Communicable Diseases Before and After the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Overweight and obesity are highly prevalent across Western populations and contribute substantially to the global burden of non-communicable diseases such as cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Despite numerous intervention efforts, achieving and sustaining long-term weight loss remains a challenge. Social Determinants of Health (SDoH) play a critical role in shaping health outcomes - including weight and weight loss trajectories - and vary across social groups and geographic contexts. This qualitative study explores participants' perceptions of personal and contextual SDoH influencing their weight loss journeys within a rural German population enrolled in a general practitioner-led pilot intervention. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 participants from the HAPpEN trial (General Practitioner-led Obesity Prevention Program: Exercise and Nutrition), which focused on individuals living in a rural area of Upper Franconia. Interview data were analyzed using a grounded theory-informed approach to qualitative content analysis, guided by the SDoH framework as a sensitizing concept. Coding and theme development followed an iterative process involving constant comparison and discussion within the research team. Key determinants affecting weight loss efforts included individual routines and schedules, social and household networks, mental health, and work-related demands. Broader contextual factors such as socialization, cultural norms, and the availability of health-supporting infrastructure also emerged. The dynamic interplay between personal motivation and structural or environmental influences appeared to be central to weight management success. This study is limited by its small and relatively homogeneous sample - predominantly female and drawn from a single rural region - which may restrict transferability to more diverse populations or urban settings. Nonetheless, the findings offer practical implications for tailoring weight loss interventions to rural contexts by incorporating the complexity of individual and social determinants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.