ArticleIEEE transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics
Advanced Feature Extraction and Outlier Detection for 3D Biological/Biomedical Image Registration.
Article in IEEE transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
3D image registration is essential in computer vision, medical imaging, and robotics. By aligning images from different perspectives into a single coordinate system, this approach provides a consistent viewpoint for analysis. Using accurate image alignment, we may compare, evaluate, and integrate data from different contexts. This paper describes a new method to register 3D or z-stack microscopy and medical image. It uses a hybrid of traditional and deep learning methods for feature extraction and adaptive likelihood-based methods for finding outliers. The proposed method uses the Scale-invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) and the Residual Network with 50 layers (ResNet50) to extract effective features to obtain precise and accurate representations of image contents. The registration approach also relies on the adaptive Maximum Likelihood Estimation SAmple Consensus (MLESAC) method, which optimizes outlier detection and increases noise and distortion resistance to improve the efficacy of these combined extracted features. This concatenation approach demonstrates robustness, flexibility, and adaptability across a variety of imaging modalities, enabling the registration of complex images with higher precision. Results show that the proposed algorithm outperforms commonly used registration methods, including SIFT, KAZE, Oriented FAST and Rotated BRIEF (ORB), and also registration software tools such as bUnwarpJ, and TurboReg. The algorithm's effectiveness is evaluated in terms of Mutual Information (MI), Phase Congruency-Based (PCB), and Gradient-Based Metrics (GBM). These metrics are applied to two types of datasets, including a brain scan dataset and 3D serial sections of multiplex microscopy image datasets.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.