ArticleIEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society2025
Confound Controlled Multimodal Neuroimaging Data Fusion and Its Application to Developmental Disorders.
Article in IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multimodal fusion provides multiple benefits over single modality analysis by leveraging both shared and complementary information from different modalities. Notably, supervised fusion enjoys extensive interest for capturing multimodal co-varying patterns associated with clinical measures. A key challenge of brain data analysis is how to handle confounds, which, if unaddressed, can lead to an unrealistic description of the relationship between the brain and clinical measures. Current approaches often rely on linear regression to remove covariate effects prior to fusion, which may lead to information loss, rather than pursue the more global strategy of optimizing both fusion and covariates removal simultaneously. Thus, we propose "CR-mCCAR" to jointly optimize for confounds within a guided fusion model, capturing co-varying multimodal patterns associated with a specific clinical domain while also discounting covariate effects. Simulations show that CR-mCCAR separate the reference and covariate factors accurately. Functional and structural neuroimaging data fusion reveals co-varying patterns in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD, striato-thalamo-cortical and salience areas) and in autism spectrum disorder (ASD, salience and fronto-temporal areas) that link with core symptoms but uncorrelate with age and motion. These results replicate in an independent cohort. Downstream classification accuracy between ADHD/ASD and controls is markedly higher for CR-mCCAR compared to fusion and regression separately. CR-mCCAR can be extended to include multiple targets and multiple covariates. Overall, results demonstrate CR-mCCAR can jointly optimize for target components that correlate with the reference(s) while removing nuisance covariates. This approach can improve the meaningful detection of reliable phenotype-linked multimodal biomarkers for brain disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.