ArticleCell reports2025
Intraspecies associations from strain-rich metagenome samples.
Article in Cell reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- How the social lives of bacteria affect their pangenome.Essays in biochemistry · 2026Review
- MetaStrainer: accurate reconstruction of bacterial strain genotypes from short-read metagenomic samples.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Intraspecies warfare restricts strain coexistence in human skin microbiomes.Nature microbiology · 2025Article
- Microbiome diversity of low biomass skin sites is captured by metagenomics but not 16S amplicon sequencing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- The microbiome of the human facial skin is unique compared to that of other hominids.mSystems · 2025Article
- Intraspecies warfare restricts strain coexistence in human skin microbiomes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genetically distinct strains of a species can vary widely in phenotype, reducing the utility of species-resolved microbiome measurements for detecting associations with health or disease. While metagenomics theoretically provides information on all strains in a sample, current strain-resolved analysis methods face a tradeoff: de novo genotyping approaches can detect novel strains but struggle when applied to strain-rich or low-coverage samples, while reference database methods work robustly across sample types but are insensitive to novel diversity. We present PHLAME, a method that bridges this divide by combining the advantages of reference database approaches with novelty awareness. PHLAME explicitly defines clades at multiple phylogenetic levels and introduces a probabilistic, mutation-based framework to quantify novelty from the nearest reference. By applying PHLAME to publicly available human skin and vaginal metagenomes, we find clade associations with coexisting species, geography, and host age. The ability to characterize intraspecies associations and dynamics in previously inaccessible environments will enable strain-level insights from accumulating metagenomic data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.