ArticleJCI insight2025
Differential pathology and susceptibility to MBNL loss across muscles in myotonic dystrophy mouse models.
Article in JCI insight, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Elimination of myotonia improves myopathy in a muscleblind-like knockout model of myotonic dystrophy.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There are 2 subtypes of myotonic dystrophy, DM1 and DM2, each caused by repeat expansion mutations. The leading pathogenic mechanism is RNA-mediated toxicity, whereby (C)CUG expansions sequester the muscleblind-like (MBNL) family of RNA binding proteins. However, key differences exist in muscle involvement patterns and histopathology between DM1 and DM2. The cause of these disparities both in how the muscles are affected within each disease and between the 2 diseases is unknown, and it is unclear if current DM mouse models recapitulate these differences or develop differential muscle susceptibility. Here, we examined the expression of disease-relevant genes across healthy human muscles from a transcriptomic atlas and collected a series of muscles from Mbnl-KO mice to evaluate characteristic histologic and molecular features of DM pathology. Our results indicate that MBNL loss discordantly affects muscles, likely through a splicing-independent mechanism, and results in a fiber atrophy profile more like DM1 than DM2. These findings point to a predominant role for MBNL loss in muscle pattern involvement in DM1, provide further evidence for additional DM2 pathomechanisms, and have important implications for muscle choice when performing analyses in new mouse models and evaluating therapeutic modalities and biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.