ReviewCurrent nutrition reports2025
Promotion of Physician Nutrition Education Through Strategic Dietitian Documentation.
Review in Current nutrition reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewMost healthcare providers believe that nutrition assessment and therapy should be an integral part of patient care. Physicians however receive inadequate nutrition education in medical school and postgraduate training, resulting in limited interest and poor integration of nutrition into clinical practice. The purpose of this paper is to present a means of documentation and presentation by registered dietitian nutritionists (RDN) that would enhance communication and assimilation of principles in clinical nutrition for physicians. RECENT
findingsIn an effort to standardize terminology, promote a uniform approach to nutrition care, and gather data for research purposes, the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (the Academy) developed the Nutrition Care Process (NCP). This process with a design and terminology unique to their specialty, inadvertently excludes pertinent clinical information from being communicated and reduces the impact of the RDN in coordinating the nutrition management of their patients. This report introduces a proposal to modify the Academy NCP with strategic documentation by which RDNs might better communicate through charting and case presentation in a language common to other services and members of the healthcare team. Strategic RDN documentation and communication would help provide education on the go in the workplace, helping to fill gaps in the nutrition knowledge base for physicians. The proposal seeks to further augment the role and clinical responsibilities of the RDN on a nutrition consult service with the ultimate aim of promoting better patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40810974What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.