Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40810970›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2025

Adoptive T-Cell Therapy in Sarcomas.

Monika Kucharczyk, Emine Hatipoglu, Robin L Jones, Paul H Huang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Monika KucharczykThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Emine HatipogluThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Robin L JonesThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Paul H HuangDivision of Cancer Biology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK. paul.huang@icr.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo summarise and evaluate the latest adoptive T-cell therapies in sarcomas, focusing on therapeutic targets, efficacy, safety, and limitations. RECENT

findingsAn increasing number of clinical trials are investigating adoptive T-cell therapies in sarcomas, most targeting NY-ESO-1 and MAGE-A4 through engineered T-cell receptors (TCR-T). The FDA approval of afamitresgene autoleucel for advanced synovial sarcoma and the breakthrough designation of letetresgene autoleucel for myxoid/round cell liposarcoma signify a major turning point. Chimeric antigen receptor T strategies target mainly B7H3, GD2, FGFR4, and HER2, with innovations including dual antigen targeting and safety switches. Tumour infiltrating lymphocyte therapy, including lifileucel, is under investigation with checkpoint inhibitors or oncolytic agents to enhance efficacy and manage toxicity. Adoptive T-cell therapy demonstrates early promise in sarcomas, particularly TCR-T therapy. Challenges include HLA restriction, tumour heterogeneity, and manufacturing complexity. Future strategies involving novel antigens, multi-targeting, and combinatorial regimens could broaden patient eligibility and improve therapeutic outcomes.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveSarcomaT-LymphocytesAntigens, NeoplasmHumansReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAntigens, NeoplasmReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAdoptive T-cell TherapyCancer-testis AntigenChimeric Antigen Receptor TEngineered T-cell ReceptorNY-ESO-1Sarcoma ImmunotherapyTumour Infiltrating Lymphocyte

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.