Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40810922›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of medical humanities2026

Engaged Medical Humanities-A Framework for Knowledge Production in Research Collaborations.

Louise Folker, Anna Lyngdal Wulff, Stig Bo Andersen, Line Steen Bygballe, Marie Gorm Aabo, Barbara Egilstrøð, Aske Juul Lassen, Astrid Pernille Jespersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of medical humanities, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Louise FolkerCopenhagen Centre for Health Research in the Humanities, Saxo Institute, Faculty of Humanities, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. folker@hum.ku.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5885-686X
Anna Lyngdal WulffCopenhagen Centre for Health Research in the Humanities, Saxo Institute, Faculty of Humanities, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-2831-3554
Stig Bo AndersenCopenhagen Centre for Health Research in the Humanities, Saxo Institute, Faculty of Humanities, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-0923-3886
Line Steen BygballeCopenhagen Centre for Health Research in the Humanities, Saxo Institute, Faculty of Humanities, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0406-7451
Marie Gorm AaboCopenhagen Centre for Health Research in the Humanities, Saxo Institute, Faculty of Humanities, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1925-5527
Barbara EgilstrøðCopenhagen Centre for Health Research in the Humanities, Saxo Institute, Faculty of Humanities, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5645-5547
Aske Juul LassenCopenhagen Centre for Health Research in the Humanities, Saxo Institute, Faculty of Humanities, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7569-5930
Astrid Pernille JespersenCopenhagen Centre for Health Research in the Humanities, Saxo Institute, Faculty of Humanities, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7583-1701

Funding

Sygeforsikring Danmark 2020-0343The Velliv Association 2019-0191The Velliv Association 2020-0721The Velliv Association 2023-1226Velux Fonden 00040212
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the field of medical humanities, there has been a general call to understand biocultural entanglements and to break down rigid distinctions between culture and health, as well as disciplinary boundaries. In line with this call, we suggest a medical humanities approach that further breaks down the distinction between basic and applied research. We conceptualize this approach as engaged medical humanities, as it both contributes to ongoing theoretical discussions and engages in empirical settings. Based on our ten-year practice of conducting medical humanities research at the Copenhagen Centre for Health Research in the Humanities (CoRe), and by zooming in on two collaborative research projects, we discuss how we realize and navigate these diverse engagements. On this basis, we offer a framework for conducting engaged medical humanities research to encourage and inspire future projects. First, we discuss how we take our main inspirations from the critical medical humanities and engaged research. Second, we identify several challenges that arise when our research approach is put into practice. We focus on our collaborations with stakeholders outside of academia, discussing how we navigate collaborative complexities while emphasizing the importance of empirical sensitivity and fluid accountabilities in studying health issues. Third, we discuss our knowledge production, encompassing various formats spanning both theoretical and conceptual contributions within academia, as well as practical interventions and instrumentation aimed at societal needs. Finally, we offer reflections on the potential we see in our framework and discuss the conditions for further developing the engaged medical humanities in a Scandinavian context.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorHumanitiesResearchDenmarkHumansResearch DesignAccountabilityCritical medical humanitiesDenmarkEngaged medical humanitiesEngaged researchTrading zone

Identifiers

PMID40810922
PMCPMC13032936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.