ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2026
Diagnostic challenges of faded hematoxylin and eosin slides: limitations of re-staining and re-sectioning and possible reason to go digital.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArchiving hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides on glass slides is problematic because the slides fade over time. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of faded slides and their restoration methods to assess the impact and limitations on diagnoses.
methodsThe study was conducted in two parts. In the first study, gastric and lung biopsy cases diagnosed between 2011 and 2012 were analyzed. Diagnostic accuracy of the faded slides was compared to the original diagnoses. In the second study, gastric biopsy cases diagnosed in 2011 and 2015 were used to obtain faded slides, create re-stained slides, and re-sectioned slides from the same cases. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using whole slide images (WSI) and compared to the original diagnoses to evaluate the effectiveness and limitations of the restoration methods.
resultsIn the first study, diagnostic accuracy for faded slides were 77.5% for gastric biopsies and 73.3% for lung biopsies, both showing significant decreases compared to the original diagnoses. The decrease in accuracy was particularly evident in the diagnosis of malignant lesions. In the second study, diagnostic accuracy was 92.4% for faded slides, slightly improving to 93.9% for re-stained slides. However, challenges such as staining inconsistencies and tissue damage were observed with re-staining. Re-sectioned slides demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy at 95.5%, but achieving perfect reproducibility was not feasible.
conclusionDiagnostic accuracy significantly decreased when using faded slides. Our findings suggest the utility of digital archiving rather than glass slide archiving.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40810899What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.