ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
Learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy surgery via the transperitoneal approach: a CUSUM analysis.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-port robotic surgery for kidney and upper tract cancer: a narrative review.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Review
- Surgical Determinants of Outcomes in Partial Nephrectomy: a Contemporary Review.Current urology reports · 2026Review
- Learning curve of single-port robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: a risk-adjusted CUSUM analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy surgery via the transperitoneal approach: a CUSUM analysis-considerations for risk adjustment and functional outcomes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Commentary on "Learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy surgery via the transperitoneal approach: a CUSUM analysis".Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RALPN) has increasingly emerged as a primary minimally invasive surgical approach for managing renal masses. In China, most urologic surgeons lack experience in transperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, and limited research exists on the learning curve for transperitoneal RALPN. This study applies cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis to evaluate the learning curve, providing clinical suggestions. We recruited patients who underwent transperitoneal RALPN performed by a single surgeon between March 2017 and December 2023. The learning curve was evaluated using CUSUM analysis of operative time (OT). The curve's peak was used as the cutoff point to stratify patients for comparative analysis of clinical characteristics and perioperative outcomes. In addition, multivariate linear regression analysis was used to identify potential factors influencing OT. 119 patients were enrolled. The curve peaked at the 38th case and subsequently declined, dividing the patients into two groups: the learning phase (38 cases) and the mastery phase (81 cases). OT (115 vs. 150 min., P < 0.001), WIT (19 vs. 24 min., P < 0.001), and hospital stay (6 vs. 7 days, P = 0.005) were lower in the mastery phase. Tumor size (P = 0.027) and surgeon experience (P < 0.001) were identified as potential risk factors for OT. This study demonstrates that the learning curve for transperitoneal RALPN is relatively short. Comparative analysis of perioperative outcomes revealed superior outcomes during the mastery phase. These findings may serve as a benchmark for urologic surgeons' skill acquisition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.