ArticleAIDS and behavior2026
Profiling the HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Cascade in Japan: A Latent Class Analysis of a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in AIDS and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To understand opportunities for improving pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake, this study constructed a PrEP cascade and examined subgroup profiles associated with transitions along the cascade among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (gbMSM) in Japan. An online cross-sectional survey was conducted from February to March 2021. The four-step PrEP cascade included awareness, willingness, initiation, and regimen use. Latent class analysis (LCA) identified participant subgroups, and logistic regression examined associations with the most significant drop-off in the cascade. Among 5,831 cisgender gbMSM not living with HIV (median age: 38 years), 52.6% were aware of PrEP, 76.4% of whom were willing to use it. However, only 20.5% of those willing had initiated PrEP-the largest decline in the cascade. Among those who initiated, 43.8% were on a daily regimen. LCA identified four subgroups: (i) Sexual Adventurers (32.1%)-high sexual activity and strong HIV community ties; (ii) Reserved Bystanders (26.7%)-low engagement with the HIV community and sexual health services; (iii) Positive Allies (24.6%)-strong HIV community ties and comfort discussing sexual health; and (iv) Young Explorers (16.7%)-younger, moderately sexually active, with limited HIV community ties. Compared to Reserved Bystanders, Sexual Adventurers (OR 5.27, 95% CI 3.91-7.10) and Positive Allies (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.14-2.26) had significantly higher odds of PrEP initiation. Despite increasing acceptability, barriers to PrEP uptake persist. Targeted interventions are needed to address subgroup-specific challenges-particularly for younger gbMSM and those with limited access to HIV community networks and sexual health services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40810881What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.