ArticleAIDS and behavior2026
PrEP and PEP for HIV Prevention Among Gay, Bisexual, and MSM in Brazil: Findings from the SMESH Study.
Article in AIDS and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The HIV epidemic remains a global concern, particularly among vulnerable populations. Effective strategies, such as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), are crucial to reducing HIV transmission. This study assessed HIV prophylaxis use among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Brazil, examined associated factors, and evaluated perceptions regarding access through the public healthcare system (SUS). A cross-sectional study (2019-2023) was conducted using respondent-driven sampling (RDS) in ten state capitals across five Brazilian regions. Eligible participants were men aged ≥ 18 years, identifying as MSM, who reported oral or anal sex with another man in the past 12 months. Data were collected via structured questionnaires on socio-behavioral characteristics. Descriptive analyses used RDS-II estimators, and associations with prophylaxis use were examined using survey-weighted Poisson regression. Among 1,139 participants, 21.4% reported PrEP use and 20.5% reported PEP use. PrEP uptake was significantly lower among individuals identifying as pardo (PR = 0.58 [95% CI 0.36-0.92]), with no significant associations found for education or social class. Both PrEP and PEP use were positively associated with having more than five sexual partners in the past six months and with having a partner living with HIV. Notably, 86.3% of participants (95% CI 81.1-91.6) expressed willingness to access PrEP through SUS. Despite high willingness, PrEP uptake remains suboptimal, particularly among pardo MSM. These findings underscore the urgency of targeted public policies to expand equitable access to HIV prevention services in Brazil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40810879What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.