ArticleAdvances in health sciences education : theory and practice2026
Medical student perceptions of establishing effective clinical communication: a qualitative study.
Article in Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Teaching communication competencies across the undergraduate medical curriculum: a qualitative exploratory case study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Comparison of Emotional Content in Text Responses From Physicians and AI Chatbots to Patient Health Queries: Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Integrating Health Communication into Basic Medical Courses: A Qualitative Study for Enhancing Professional Competencies in Undergraduate Medical Students.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
- The Influence of Anesthesiologist Gender and Experience on Risk Understanding and Anxiety Changes After Online Preoperative Patient Education: A Sub-Analysis of the iPREDICT Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-quality delivery of healthcare requires effective communication between patients and providers. Clinical communication has been a priority in medical education for decades, yet studies continue to show that trainees and providers struggle to communicate effectively in real and simulated clinical scenarios. Many have investigated potential methods to improve the initial acquisition, long-term retention, and holistic evaluation of clinical communication competency in medical trainees. However, there has been a lack of rigorous qualitative research investigating the medical student perspective on this process. This study aimed to identify medical student perceptions of what factors may influence effective clinical communication and how those factors evolve with time. Twenty-two medical students were interviewed between August 2021 and May 2022 at the University of Mississippi Medical Center. Their interviews were transcribed and analyzed using deductive, inductive, and categorical coding methods to construct themes. These themes identified six influencing factors (personal identity; biases and assumptions; norms and expectations; language; episodic contexts; and comfort and trust) and one impact (evolution of personal identity). The relationships between these themes enabled the researchers to establish a preliminary model that demonstrates how medical students believe effective clinical communication occurs. Medical educators may use this model to develop innovative curricular objectives, assessment methods, and teaching strategies that might improve student's acquisition and demonstration of effective clinical communication. These improvements may be most beneficial for students who face minority stress, as well as those combating oppressive systems based on the complex relationships between their multiple minority identities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.