Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40810854›Full record

ArticleAdvances in health sciences education : theory and practice2026

Medical student perceptions of establishing effective clinical communication: a qualitative study.

Kathryn Veazey, Andrew Notebaert, Ellen M Robertson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kathryn VeazeyDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Drexel University College of Medicine, 50 Innovation Way, Wyomissing, PA, 19610, USA. kv452@drexel.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2795-1183
Andrew NotebaertCollege of Health and Human Sciences, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-1749-9035
Ellen M RobertsonDepartment of Physician Assistant Studies, Randolph-Macon College, Ashland, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7967-6588

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-quality delivery of healthcare requires effective communication between patients and providers. Clinical communication has been a priority in medical education for decades, yet studies continue to show that trainees and providers struggle to communicate effectively in real and simulated clinical scenarios. Many have investigated potential methods to improve the initial acquisition, long-term retention, and holistic evaluation of clinical communication competency in medical trainees. However, there has been a lack of rigorous qualitative research investigating the medical student perspective on this process. This study aimed to identify medical student perceptions of what factors may influence effective clinical communication and how those factors evolve with time. Twenty-two medical students were interviewed between August 2021 and May 2022 at the University of Mississippi Medical Center. Their interviews were transcribed and analyzed using deductive, inductive, and categorical coding methods to construct themes. These themes identified six influencing factors (personal identity; biases and assumptions; norms and expectations; language; episodic contexts; and comfort and trust) and one impact (evolution of personal identity). The relationships between these themes enabled the researchers to establish a preliminary model that demonstrates how medical students believe effective clinical communication occurs. Medical educators may use this model to develop innovative curricular objectives, assessment methods, and teaching strategies that might improve student's acquisition and demonstration of effective clinical communication. These improvements may be most beneficial for students who face minority stress, as well as those combating oppressive systems based on the complex relationships between their multiple minority identities.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCommunicationPhysician-Patient RelationsStudents, MedicalAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative ResearchTrustIdentity concordanceIntersectionalityMedical educationMinority stress

Identifiers

PMID40810854
PMCPMC13046580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.