Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40810840›Full record

ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2025

Diagnostic Performance of Four Serological Assays for Bovine Brucellosis and Optimised Cutoff Thresholds in an Endemic Region of Iran.

Faranak Abnaroodheleh, Fereshteh Ansari, Youcef Shahali, Maryam Dadar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Faranak AbnaroodhelehDiagnosis and Treatment Department, Tehran Veterinary Organization, Tehran, Iran.
Fereshteh AnsariRazi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran.
Youcef ShahaliUniversity Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France.
Maryam DadarBrucellosis Department, Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5831-801X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brucellosis is a severe zoonotic infection impacting dairy cattle, requiring accurate diagnostic assays for efficient control programs. This cross-sectional study was conducted in Alborz Province, Iran, to assess the diagnostic efficacy of four serological tests for Brucella detection. One thousand serum samples were obtained from dairy cattle and analysed over 1 year of age. Furthermore, milk specimens from seropositive cows were cultured for bacteriological analysis. Serological testing detected Brucella antibodies in 33% of samples using RBT, 19.4% by SAT, 17.6% by 2-ME and 33.5% by I-ELISA. Bacterial culture detected Brucella spp. in 16.6% of seropositive milk samples, with all isolates classified as Brucella abortus biovar 3. Statistical methods were used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of each test. Bayesian latent class analysis revealed that I-ELISA demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy for Brucella infection in dairy cattle, with superior sensitivity and specificity. In contrast, SAT and 2-ME exhibited high specificity but lower sensitivity, while RBT showed moderate sensitivity with low specificity. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed based on the results obtained from the Bayesian latent class analysis to further evaluate the diagnostic performance of the tests. Furthermore, the ROC curve analysis showed that SAT and 2-ME displayed strong concordance with RBT. The ideal threshold for SAT and 2-ME titers was established at 5.00, optimising sensitivity and specificity. Cohen's kappa analysis assessed agreement levels, revealing that RBT demonstrated the highest concordance with I-ELISA. The results indicate that although RBT offers a simple screening approach, its sensitivity constraints require validation by I-ELISA. A significant portion of infected animals (20%) might be undetected using RBT. These findings underscore the need for various serological assays to identify brucellosis in endemic areas accurately.

Indexed as

Brucella abortusBrucellosis, BovineSerologic TestsAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialBrucellaCattleCross-Sectional StudiesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleIranMilkSensitivity and SpecificityAntibodies, BacterialaccuracyBrucellabrucellosisdiagnosisseroprevalence

Identifiers

PMID40810840
PMCPMC12352339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.