ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2026
[
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparable effectiveness of intensive intravenous and less intensive immunosuppressive treatment in retroperitoneal fibrosis: a retrospective real-world cohort study.Rheumatology international · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRetroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF) is a rare inflammatory disease, that, if left untreated, can lead to ureteral obstruction and subsequent renal impairment. First-line treatment is prednisolone, with rituximab, often used for refractory cases. This study evaluates treatment response in both [
methods50 patients with RPF underwent at least two [
resultsAll PET parameters showed significant correlations with CT
conclusionOur findings underscore the superiority of PET against CT in therapy monitoring of RPF, especially in the detection of progression at FU2. Higher BL MAV correlated with progression at FU2, indicating its potential as a predictive marker. Still, especially when PET is not available, CT can be considered for initial therapy monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.