ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2026
Deep learning-based non-invasive prediction of PD-L1 status and immunotherapy survival stratification in esophageal cancer using [
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio-centered machine learning model for predicting immunotherapy response in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Machine learning applications in the detection and treatment of esophageal cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Dual-tracer PET/CT for lung and prostate cancer: 18F-FDG and 18F-PSMA-1007.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to develop and validate deep learning models using [
methodsIn this retrospective study, we included 331 EC patients from two centers, dividing them into training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts. Fifty patients who received immunotherapy were followed up. We developed four 3D ResNet10-based models-PET + CT + clinical factors (CPC), PET + CT (PC), PET (P), and CT (C)-using pre-treatment [
resultsThe models demonstrated accurate prediction of PD-L1 status. The areas under the curve (AUCs) for predicting PD-L1 status were as follows: CPC (0.927), PC (0.904), P (0.886), C (0.934), and the clinical model (0.603) in the training cohort; CPC (0.882), PC (0.848), P (0.770), C (0.745), and the clinical model (0.524) in the internal validation cohort; and CPC (0.843), PC (0.806), P (0.759), C (0.667), and the clinical model (0.671) in the external validation cohort. The CPC and PC models exhibited superior predictive performance. Survival analysis revealed that the DLS from most models effectively stratified overall survival and progression-free survival at appropriate cut-off points (P < 0.05), outperforming stratification based on PD-L1 status (combined positive score ≥ 10). Furthermore, incorporating model scores with clinical factors in nomograms enhanced the predictive probability of survival after immunotherapy.
conclusionDeep learning models based on [
Indexed as
Identifiers
40810801What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.