Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40810793›Full record

ArticleOecologia2025

Insect herbivory differentially affects the behaviour of two pollinators of Brassica rapa.

Hanneke A C Suijkerbuijk, Erik H Poelman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hanneke A C SuijkerbuijkLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands. Hanneke.Suijkerbuijk@wur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-0566-6621
Erik H PoelmanLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek GSGT.2019.014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pollinator behaviour during floral visits shapes plant mating opportunities, influencing the likelihood of outcrossing versus selfing. These behaviours may be affected by plant responses to antagonists such as insect herbivores. This study aimed to better understand how insect herbivory affects visitation behaviour of two pollinator community members of field mustard (Brassica rapa): the buff-tailed bumblebee (Bombus terrestris) and the large cabbage white butterfly (Pieris brassicae). In field tent experiments, we allowed caterpillars of P. brassicae to develop from leaf-feeding early instars to flower-feeding late instars and assessed pollinator response to undamaged and damaged plants during 10-min observations. We recorded behaviours with potential effect on outcrossing: (first) choice and overall plant preference, plant visit duration, number and duration of flower visits per plant, and distance travelled between plant visits. Bumblebees visited more plants and flowers, but spent less time per flower than butterflies did. Bumblebees often travelled to neighboring plants, whereas butterflies often flew longer distances to reach a next plant. Herbivory by large florivorous caterpillars altered butterfly plant choice-mostly towards plants with caterpillars, but not their behaviour on the plant. Bumblebees did not alter their choices, but changed their behaviour on the plant: they visited more flowers on plants with herbivory. However, herbivory by small leaf-feeding caterpillars did not affect the behaviour of either pollinator. Our results show that pollinator community members respond differently to herbivory and that this response changes over time, potentially affecting plant mating patterns.

Indexed as

Brassica rapaButterfliesHerbivoryPollinationAnimalsBeesFlowersBumblebeeButterflyHerbivore-induced responsePlant reproductionPlasticityPollination

Identifiers

PMID40810793
PMCPMC12354498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.