Trial reportCerebellum (London, England)2025
Speech Treatment for People with Cerebellar Multiple System Atrophy (MSA-C): A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial of Two Approaches.
Trial report in Cerebellum (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Speech problems are an early feature of Multiple System Atrophy (MSA). They can lead to social withdrawal and have significant impact on people's quality of life. There is a considerable lack of clinical trials and clinicians lack guidance on how best to support this population. This project aimed to establish the feasibility and acceptability of a novel treatment approach, ClearSpeechTogether, in patients with the cerebellar variant of MSA (MSA-C), and to pilot an RCT comparing this treatment to standard speech and language therapy (SLT) treatment (ST). We recruited 24 patients with clinically probable MSA-C and dysarthria who were randomised to either treatment arm. Full data were available for 9 participants for ST, and 11 for ClearSpeechTogether. Both interventions lasted 6 weeks, ST offered 1 h of individual therapy a week, ClearSpeechTogether provided four individual therapy sessions over two weeks, followed by four weeks of daily, patient led group practice. Assessment and intervention were provided online via videoconferencing software. Data collection focused on feasibility, acceptability and signal of efficacy. Recruitment, conversion and attrition rates were within or close to target, and neither participants nor clinicians highlighted any acceptability issues. Communication outcomes were mixed, with biggest gains made in communication confidence and participation across both groups. Rapid decline in overall health status appeared to have impacted results. Results were generally positive and support the implementation of larger follow up trials. The study also demonstrated that people with MSA-C can benefit from speech therapy even at more severe stages of their disease progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.