ArticleBrain topography2025
ERP Signals During Speech Articulation: Does Auditory Feedback Mask Other Ongoing Cognitive-motor Processes?
Article in Brain topography, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study of speech planning/programming may require analysing Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) during articulation. However, ERPs identified during speech production also contain brain signals associated with auditory feedback. Because these processes are both time-locked to the vocal onset, existing algorithms for signal separation have difficulties distinguishing one from the other. Here, we investigated the use of the multi-channel Wiener filter (MWF) to remove the ERP signal related to auditory processing from the ERP signal related to speech production. In a first step, participants were asked to overtly produce mono- or disyllabic pseudowords. In a second step, they had to listen to the recording of their own productions. We used the ERP signal associated with hearing one's own production (referred to as listening ERPs) to estimate and filter out the auditory part of the production ERP. We investigated three versions of the ERPs during speech articulation: (1) the original production ERPs, (2) the ERPs filtered through the MWF, and (3) subtraction ERPs obtained by subtracting the listening ERPs from the original ERPs. Firstly, we conducted a microstate analysis comparing all three versions of the ERPs. Secondly, we conducted separate microstate analyses comparing mono- versus disyllabic conditions on each of the three versions. The results indicate that the subtraction method alters topography consistency and may remove relevant signal from the ERPs. The filtered ERP produced similar results to the original production ERP and thus, it may be unnecessary to remove auditory feedback or other overlapping signal if time-locked to the production onset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.