ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Protocol to improve quality of life, functionality, and exercise capacity in patients with axillary web syndrome after breast cancer: a randomized clinical trial.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05115799 (Effects of a Manual Therapy Program to Reduce the Evolution Time of Axillary Web Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effects of a Manual Therapy Program to Reduce the Evolution Time of Axillary Web Syndrome
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Axillary Web Syndrome Beyond Breast Cancer: Expanding the Clinical Spectrum Through Illustrative Cases and Contemporary Evidence.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Letter to the editor: Protocol to improve quality of life, functionality, and exercise capacity in patients with axillary web syndrome after breast cancer: a randomized clinical trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo improve functionality, quality of life, and exercise capacity in women who underwent breast cancer surgery and suffered axillary web syndrome (AWS) as a sequela.
designProspective, randomized, single-blind clinical trial.
settingSingle-center study.
participantsForty-six post-breast cancer surgery patients with AWS had restricted functionality, quality of life, and exercise capacity.
interventionsStretching combined with manual therapy and scar massage to release adhesion and lymphatic cord during 15 physiotherapy sessions of 30-40 min each.
main outcome measuresFunctionality was evaluated with DASH and Constant Scale, exercise capacity with IPAQ, and quality of life with EORTC QLQ-BR23. Participants were allocated to either intervention or control group using the Excel randomization tool. Blinding of the therapist was not possible due to the study's nature.
resultsTwenty-five patients were assigned to the intervention group and twenty-three to the control group, becoming twenty-four and twenty-two, respectively, for analysis. Significant differences were detected in functionality and quality of life. The intervention effect varied over time with a 95% confidence interval (alpha 0.05) and a statistical power of 90% (beta 0.1). Comparisons between groups showed significant differences in favor of the intervention group at 30, 60, and 90 days of follow-up.
conclusionStretching combined with scar massage and manipulative tissue release techniques improved functionality and quality of life in AWS patients. This physiotherapy technique could be considered the treatment of choice for this surgical sequela.
trial registrationCLINICALTRIALS: gov Registry (NCT05115799) on June 10, 2021, and the approval of the Andalucía Ethics Committee (PEIBA code 1909-N1-21, reg. number 171.21).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.