Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40810784›Full record

ReviewPlanta2025

A survey: to identify plant leaf diseases by feature extraction methods and classification techniques.

Karan Soni, Rakesh Chandra Gangwar

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Planta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Karan SoniDepartment of Computer Science Engineering, Sardar Beant Singh State University, Gurdaspur, Punjab, India. karan.soni@nic.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-7448-6700
Rakesh Chandra GangwarDepartment of Computer Science Engineering, Sardar Beant Singh State University, Gurdaspur, Punjab, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionThis survey concludes that CNN-based deep learning models offer opportunities for early and accurate plant disease detection, supporting sustainable agriculture while acknowledging potential challenges in practical real-world application. Deep learning (DL) methods have transformed image-based plant disease diagnosis by addressing complex challenges specific to crop health monitoring in agriculture. The automated identification and classification of plant disease from images have significant interest, which can be expected to increase crop health monitoring and agricultural productivity. Yet, notwithstanding these benefits, image-based identification of plant diseases is a sophisticated challenge. Proper identification of certain plant varieties and proper determination of disease manifestations are key factors in the administration of effective care and sustainable management of disease. In this research paper an extensive overview Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) is implemented using deep learning method for disease detection in plants. This article focuses particularly on highlighting recent research achievements by the last half-decade emphasizing CNN-based models constructed for detecting plant leaf disease. The survey delves into key innovations, methods, and issues faced with the application of CNNs to monitor plant health. Specifically, it highlights the manner in which deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs), learned using large-scale image databases, are becoming effective means of early and precise detection of plant diseases. Lastly, this paper charts exciting future directions for DL-aided plant disease diagnosis, while providing a balanced critique of the potential, as well as the limitations of CNNs in practical agricultural contexts.

Indexed as

Plant DiseasesPlant LeavesCrops, AgriculturalDeep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerClassification techniquesCNNsDeep learningDiseases detectionImage-based techniquesMachine learningPlant leaf detection

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.