ArticlePhysical therapy2025
An Intensive Upper Extremity Program Coupled With a Wearable Device for Poststroke Rehabilitation: A Qualitative Study of the Perspectives of People With Stroke.
Article in Physical therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Randomized Control Trial of a Virtually Delivered Program for Increasing Upper Limb Activity After Stroke.Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe Virtual Arm Boot Camp program (V-ABC) was one of the first virtually delivered upper extremity exercise programs coupled with a novel wearable device that provided reach-to-grasp feedback for individuals with stroke. Understanding the experience of participants is critical to improving the implementation of rehabilitation interventions that embed biosensor technology within rehabilitation.
designA qualitative study embedded within a multi-center randomized controlled trial conducted on the CanStroke Recovery Trials Platform was used to investigate the experiences of participants post-stroke with the V-ABC program. A qualitative descriptive methodology was used to examine the acceptability of the program, factors influencing its effectiveness, and key elements for practical implementation. Semi-structured interviews were conducted via video conferencing with participants who had completed the program. Conventional content analysis was conducted to analyze the data. Strategies including triangulation, regular analytical meetings, peer examination, and reflexivity were used to increase the trustworthiness.
settingInterviews were conducted via videoconferencing using Zoom software.
participantsNineteen participants post-stroke (10 males/8 females, mean age = 60.2 [SD = 12.2] years; mean length of time since stroke = 217.0 [SD = 109.2] days) after completion of the program.
interventionThe 3-week V-ABC program consisted of exercise, feedback from a wearable device on the use of the paretic upper extremity, and therapist support.
resultsThree themes describing the experiences of participants with the program were identified: (1) V-ABC provided motivating practice; (2) equipment and technology setup provided accessibility but posed challenges; and (3) increased use of the paretic hand can be integrated into daily life with varying degrees of success.
conclusionsAn intensive, virtually delivered upper extremity exercise program coupled with biosensing feedback on hand use from a wearable device was reported to be motivating, accessible, and facilitated use of paretic hands in daily life. The findings may help improve the future implementation of the V-ABC program and similar approaches involving telerehabilitation and wearable technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.