Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40810448›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2025

Early Diagnosis of Knee Osteoarthritis With a Natural Language Processing-Driven Approach Based on Clinician Notes: Development and Validation Study.

Narathip Thanyakunsajja, Kulsawasd Jitkajornwanich, Shan Xu, Donghee Shin, Pattama Charoenporn

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Advances in deep learning multimodal fusion for early diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Narathip ThanyakunsajjaKing Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0009-0007-1086-8830
Kulsawasd JitkajornwanichTexas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6926-7577
Shan XuTexas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2251-8682
Donghee ShinTexas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5439-4493
Pattama CharoenpornKing Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-2213-7169

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKnee osteoarthritis (OA) is a common form of knee arthritis that can cause significant disability and affect a patient's quality of life. Although this disease is chronic and irreversible, the patient's condition can be improved and the progression of the disease can be prevented if the disease is diagnosed early and the patient receives appropriate treatment immediately. Therefore, the prediction of knee OA is considered one of the essential steps to effectively diagnose and prevent further severe OA conditions. Knee OA is commonly diagnosed by medical experts or physicians, and the diagnosis of OA is mainly based on patients' laboratory results and medical images, including x-ray and magnetic resonance images. However, diagnosis through such data is often time-consuming. Moreover, the diagnosis results can vary among physicians depending on their expertise. Previous studies mostly focused on using approaches, such as those involving artificial intelligence, to automatically detect knee OA through such data. However, these studies did not incorporate clinicians' or doctors' notes (text data) into the analysis, although these data involving reported symptoms and behaviors are already available and easier to collect and access than laboratory data and image data.

objectiveWe propose a novel natural language processing-driven approach based on clinicians' or doctors' notes of patient-reported symptoms (text data only) for diagnosing knee OA.

methodsThe textual information from clinicians' or doctors' notes was first preprocessed using text analysis algorithms with respect to natural language processing. We then incorporated deep learning models, including convolutional neural networks, bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM), and gated recurrent units. Lastly, a disease-specific standard questionnaire called WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index) was taken into account to improve the overall performance of the models.

resultsOur experiment included 5849 records (OA: 3455; non-OA: 2394). Before applying our WOMAC-based processing approach, the best-performing model was BiLSTM (area under the curve, 0.85; accuracy, 0.87; precision, 0.85; sensitivity, 0.95; specificity, 0.76; F

conclusionsOur proposed method for predicting the occurrence of knee OA showed better performance than other conventional methods that use image data and statistical laboratory data. The findings indicate the feasibility of using text data (symptom descriptions reported by patients and recorded by doctors) to predict knee OA. Medical notes of symptom reports can be considered a valuable data source for predicting whether a particular knee is likely to experience OA progression.

Indexed as

Early DiagnosisNatural Language ProcessingOsteoarthritis, KneeAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedartificial intelligencecomputational communicationhealth informaticsnatural language processingtext mining

Identifiers

PMID40810448
PMCPMC12395113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.