ArticleACS applied materials & interfaces2025
Direct Measurement and Modeling of Wrapping Layer on Lubricant-Infused Surfaces.
Article in ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Drop Friction on Textured Lubricant-Coated Surfaces.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
By enabling an atomically smooth and chemically homogeneous interface, state-of-the-art lubricant-infused surfaces minimize contact line pinning, which directly translates to remarkable droplet mobility and ultralow drop friction. A unique feature of these surfaces is the formation of a wrapping layer─a nanometric lubricant film that encapsulates droplets. However, the mechanism that governs the formation of the wrapping oil layer and its thickness remains poorly understood to date. In this study, we develop and experimentally validate a theoretical modeling framework for the wrapping layer thickness by balancing two competing forces: curvature-induced Laplace pressure and van der Waals interaction-induced disjoining pressure. Using planar laser-induced fluorescence microscopy, we directly visualized and measured the wrapping layer thickness across a range of droplet radii, lubricant viscosities, and lubricant thicknesses used to impregnate the underlying textured substrate. Our results show that the wrapping layer thickness, which is insensitive to lubricant viscosity and initial thickness, scales with the droplet radius to the 1/3rd power. After lending credence to our analytical approach by validating model predictions with experiment, we estimated the volume of the wrapping layer using a simple, yet important, scaling argument. Moreover, we estimated the wetting ridge volume by capturing the steady-state shape of the oil meniscus that forms near the droplet base. Our analysis and theretical treatment show that the volume of oil in the wrapping layer is four orders of magnitude smaller than that of the wetting ridge, a result that points to the annular wetting ridge as the major source of lubricant depletion by moving droplets. The insights gained from this work improve the current understanding of wrapping layer dynamics and its impact on lubricant depletion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.