ReviewmAbs2025
Machine learning-driven optimization of culture conditions and media components to mitigate charge heterogeneity in monoclonal antibody production: current advances and future perspectives.
Review in mAbs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Data-Driven Approach for Bioreactor Monitoring and Prediction in Monoclonal Antibody Production.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Microorganism-Based Biological Products for Agriculture: From Strain Selection to Production Organization.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence advancements in monoclonal antibody development technology.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Exploring ethical, sustainable and effective foetal bovine serum alternatives forFrontiers in toxicology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Charge heterogeneity in monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), caused by post-translational modifications, remains a substantial obstacle to ensuring consistent, stable, and effective therapeutics. Conventional optimization techniques, such as one-factor-at-a-time and design of experiments, often fail to capture the complex, nonlinear interactions between culture parameters (e.g. pH, temperature, duration) and medium components (e.g. glucose, metal ions, amino acids). This review highlights machine learning (ML) as a powerful approach for modeling these relationships and forecasting charge variant profiles in CHO cell-based mAb process development. We summarize supervised learning and regression methods used to link process conditions with charge heterogeneity and present case studies showing ML's role in reducing acidic and basic variants. We also discuss challenges related to data quality, model interpretability, scalability, and regulatory compliance. Finally, we propose a roadmap for adaptive, ML-driven optimization strategies for bioprocess development, aligned with Quality-by-Design principles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.