Trial reportJournal of sleep research2026
The Effect of Sleep Loss on Retrospective Metacognitive Judgements Across Five Cognitive Tests.
Trial report in Journal of sleep research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Effect of Sleep Loss on Retrospective Metacognitive Judgements Across Five Cognitive Tests.Journal of sleep research · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sleep loss impairs many cognitive functions, ranging from simple attention to working memory. This study explores the extent to which people are aware of such impairments, their metacognitive accuracy, across different cognitive tests. Healthy participants (N = 182) were randomised to one night of total sleep deprivation or three nights of sufficient sleep. The next day they performed several cognitive tests, measuring simple attention, cognitive throughput, working memory, episodic memory and executive processing (using a Stroop task). After each test, participants rated how well they thought they performed. We operationalised metacognitive accuracy as the ability to correctly identify whether one performed above or below the median. We then used Bayesian methods to estimate the difference in this ability between the well-rested and sleep-deprived groups. The probability was 55% in the sleep-deprived group, and 59% in the rested group, suggesting some decrease in performance awareness during sleep loss. However, the probability that this difference in judgements is practically significant (i.e., exceeding 10 percentage points) is below 1%. Cognitive ability generally declines during sleep deprivation, and this was at least somewhat reflected in a decrease in how people rated their performance. The question remains whether and how people compensate for any sleep-loss induced cognitive impairments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.