ReviewBiotechnology progress
Optimizing clarification processes in biopharmaceutical manufacturing through quality by design: Strategies, implications, and future prospects.
Review in Biotechnology progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Revisiting the Carbon Footprint of Single-Use Technologies in Biomanufacturing: A Bottom-Up Analysis Reveals a Paradigm Shift.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2026Article
- Optimizing clarification processes in biopharmaceutical manufacturing through quality by design: Strategies, implications, and future prospects.Biotechnology progressReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biopharmaceutical manufacturing processes in which the product of interest is extracellularly expressed typically employ a clarification step following cell culture or fermentation. During clarification, crude cell culture fluid or fermentation broth is processed to remove insoluble solids, cells, debris, and other particulates, with the extracellular product of interest retained in the filtrate. Soluble impurities, such as host cell proteins (HCPs), may also be partially removed. Historically, the clarification process has been considered a limited contributor to Critical Quality Attributes (CQA). As part of upstream harvest, many biopharmaceutical companies have not fully developed quality control strategies from process development to manufacturing, complicating the application of Quality by Design (QbD) principles to this step. However, advancements in upstream and downstream processing (DSP) technologies, alongside increasing cell counts and titers, necessitate reevaluating clarification as a critical process contributing to drug product quality. Conducting controlled studies to define the process and establish parameters using QbD principles can improve control over process impurities and facilitate a logical quality control strategy, integrating quality into the process. This article describes a systematic approach to QbD for a harvest clarification process where the product of interest is extracellular and impurities are removed in the filtrate post-clarification. It highlights methods for optimizing the clarification unit operation using QbD principles, ensuring better process efficiency, and product quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.