Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40810245›Full record

ReviewBiotechnology progress

Optimizing clarification processes in biopharmaceutical manufacturing through quality by design: Strategies, implications, and future prospects.

Kyeong-Won Yeop, Hyun-Ju Nam, Chang-Jae Shim, So-Mi Yang, Hyo-Won Kim, Cheon Ik Park, Subhasis Banerjee, Yanglin Mok

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biotechnology progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kyeong-Won YeopTechnical Scientific Solutions (TSS) group, Downstream process, Manufacturing Science and Technology, Life Science, Process Solutions Merck Ltd. (An Affiliate of Merck KGaA) Darmstadt, Germany, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0009-0007-1001-4552
Hyun-Ju NamTechnical Scientific Solutions (TSS) group, Downstream process, Manufacturing Science and Technology, Life Science, Process Solutions Merck Ltd. (An Affiliate of Merck KGaA) Darmstadt, Germany, Seoul, South Korea.
Chang-Jae ShimTechnical Scientific Solutions (TSS) group, Downstream process, Manufacturing Science and Technology, Life Science, Process Solutions Merck Ltd. (An Affiliate of Merck KGaA) Darmstadt, Germany, Seoul, South Korea.
So-Mi YangTechnical Scientific Solutions (TSS) group, Downstream process, Manufacturing Science and Technology, Life Science, Process Solutions Merck Ltd. (An Affiliate of Merck KGaA) Darmstadt, Germany, Seoul, South Korea.
Hyo-Won KimTechnical Scientific Solutions (TSS) group, Downstream process, Manufacturing Science and Technology, Life Science, Process Solutions Merck Ltd. (An Affiliate of Merck KGaA) Darmstadt, Germany, Seoul, South Korea.
Cheon Ik ParkTechnical Scientific Solutions (TSS) group, Downstream process, Manufacturing Science and Technology, Life Science, Process Solutions Merck Ltd. (An Affiliate of Merck KGaA) Darmstadt, Germany, Seoul, South Korea.
Subhasis BanerjeeLife Science, Process Solutions Merck Life Sciences India Pvt. Ltd. (An Affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), Bangalore, India.
Yanglin MokLife Science, Process Solutions Merck Pte Ltd. (An Affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biopharmaceutical manufacturing processes in which the product of interest is extracellularly expressed typically employ a clarification step following cell culture or fermentation. During clarification, crude cell culture fluid or fermentation broth is processed to remove insoluble solids, cells, debris, and other particulates, with the extracellular product of interest retained in the filtrate. Soluble impurities, such as host cell proteins (HCPs), may also be partially removed. Historically, the clarification process has been considered a limited contributor to Critical Quality Attributes (CQA). As part of upstream harvest, many biopharmaceutical companies have not fully developed quality control strategies from process development to manufacturing, complicating the application of Quality by Design (QbD) principles to this step. However, advancements in upstream and downstream processing (DSP) technologies, alongside increasing cell counts and titers, necessitate reevaluating clarification as a critical process contributing to drug product quality. Conducting controlled studies to define the process and establish parameters using QbD principles can improve control over process impurities and facilitate a logical quality control strategy, integrating quality into the process. This article describes a systematic approach to QbD for a harvest clarification process where the product of interest is extracellular and impurities are removed in the filtrate post-clarification. It highlights methods for optimizing the clarification unit operation using QbD principles, ensuring better process efficiency, and product quality.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsBiopharmaceuticsBiotechnologyCell Culture TechniquesFermentationQuality ControlBiological ProductsclarificationCPP (critical process parameter)CQA (critical quality attribute)depth filterflux (LMH)harvestHCPQbD (quality by design)

Identifiers

PMID40810245
PMCPMC12696446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.