ArticleInfection and drug resistance2025
A Tentative Clinical Study: Colistin Combined with Ceftazidime/Avibactam in the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli Infection.
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The efficacy and safety of colistimethate sodium in the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli: a real-world observational study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The emergence of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB) has led to a critical challenge in antimicrobial therapy. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of colistin (COL) combined with ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) in the treatment of CR-GNB infections. Patients and Methods: A retrospective, single-center observational study was conducted on patients diagnosed with CR-GNB infections who were treated with COL combined with CAZ/AVI (C/C), COL combined with Tigecycline (C/T), and COL combined with meropenem (C/M). The primary outcome measure was the rate of microbiological clearance within seven days, while secondary outcomes included changes in inflammatory markers, severe illness-related scores, length of stay, and survival rates. Results: Among the 95 patients analyzed, the C/C treatment regimen resulted in a higher rate of microbiological clearance (64.7%) compared to C/T (24.1%) and C/M (25.0%) ( Conclusion: The C/C treatment regimen appears to be more effective in achieving microbiological clearance and improving inflammatory parameters in patients with CR-GNB infections. While the impact on survival rates and survival duration requires further investigation, the C/C regimen warrants consideration as a potent therapeutic option for CR-GNB infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.