ArticleACS pharmacology & translational science2025
Applying the EU Regulatory Framework to Determine the Benefit-Risk Profile of Psychedelics.
Article in ACS pharmacology & translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Marketing authorization applications for psychedelics must align with the regulatory requirements and evidentiary standards required for the approval of all medicinal products in the European Union. While medicine regulators recognize the therapeutic potential of psychedelics, their characteristics present methodological challenges that complicate the design and interpretation of pivotal trials intended to assess their benefit-risk profile. This Viewpoint presents the European Medicines Agency's perspective on the main knowledge gaps that must be addressed to ensure robust evidence generation for regulatory decision-making, as discussed at a multistakeholder workshop convened by the Agency in April 2024. Central among these are issues related to functional unblinding and expectancy and nocebo effects. Furthermore, characteristics of the trial population must be rigorously aligned with those defined in the therapeutic indication to ensure findings are relevant and generalizable. Development programmes should also support the characterization of the dose-response relationship, both in terms of pharmacological effects and the association between the subjective experience and therapeutic response. Moreover, the decision to incorporate either psychological support or psychotherapy in the therapeutic framework has methodological implications for the trial's design and protocol, as well as the conditions for use, all of which require careful consideration. Additionally, characterization of the safety profile of psychedelics necessitates a multifaceted approach, including adequately powered clinical trials, the use of appropriate controls, the development of robust risk mitigation strategies, the establishment of continuous safety monitoring protocols, and the systematic consideration of ethical implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.