ArticleACS pharmacology & translational science2025
Optimization and Evaluation of Complementary Degrader Discovery Assays for Application in Screening.
Article in ACS pharmacology & translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Targeted protein degradation (TPD) mediated by molecular glues is an innovative pharmaceutical paradigm. By binding to and modulating the surface of an E3-ligase component, molecular glue degraders can facilitate the recruitment of a specific target protein (or vice versa) and ultimately invoke target degradation. This mode of action results in specific challenges for the development of rational discovery strategies, and complex hit validation workflows may be required to reliably eliminate compounds that elicit nonspecific effects. With the aim to guide screening efforts, we optimized two orthogonal cell-based, target-centric assays for degrader discovery: (1) a time-resolved FRET assay directly quantifying the levels of a target protein and its degradation (signal inhibition) and (2) an assay coupling TPD to cell growth (signal rescue). To enable a deeper understanding of the individual assays' strengths and limitations, we compared their statistical performance as well as respective hit populations by screening a specifically designed collection of about 1000 compounds containing well-annotated reference compounds and known frequent hitters (FHs). We found that the signal rescue format reliably and specifically captured active target degraders while efficiently filtering out interfering or FH compounds. Importantly, this format achieved to retrieve lower potency hits, which might be desirable in order to confidently include as many diverse chemical starting points as possible at the start of a drug discovery project.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.