Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40810132›Full record

ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2025

CANOPY-N: A Phase 2 Study of Canakinumab or Pembrolizumab, Alone or in Combination, as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients With Resectable, Stage IB-IIIA NSCLC.

Jay M Lee, Jean-Louis Pujol, Jun Zhang, Oleg Leonov, Masahiro Tsuboi, Edward S Kim, Calvin Ng, Nicolas Moreno-Mata, Amy Cummings, Ilhan Hacibekiroglu and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Jay M LeeUCLA Health, Los Angeles, California.
Jean-Louis PujolCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Jun ZhangUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
Oleg LeonovClinical Oncological Dispensary, Omsk, Russia.
Masahiro TsuboiNational Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Edward S KimCity of Hope National Medical Center, Irvine, California.
Calvin NgChinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Nicolas Moreno-MataHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Amy CummingsUCLA Health, Los Angeles, California.
Ilhan HacibekirogluSakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey.
Abidin SehitogullariSakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey.
Nirmal VeeramachaneniSaint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri.
Cathy SpillaneNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Dublin, Ireland.
Jiawei DuanNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Dublin, Ireland.
Claudia BossenNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Alexander SavchenkoNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Chiara Lobetti-BodoniNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Tony MokChinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Pilar GarridoHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Canakinumab is a human monoclonal anti-interleukin-1β antibody with the potential to enhance the activity of programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors by inhibiting protumor inflammation. Methods: CANOPY-N was a randomized, phase 2 study to evaluate safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant canakinumab (200 mg subcutaneous once every three weeks) and pembrolizumab (200 mg intravenous once every three weeks), either in combination or alone, in patients with early-stage (stage Ib-IIIa) NSCLC. The primary end point was major pathologic response (MPR) rates (≤10% of residual tumor cells) by central pathology review in the arms containing canakinumab. Secondary end points included overall response rates, safety, pharmacokinetics, surgical feasibility rates, and MPR rate in the pembrolizumab arm. The impact of treatment on surgical outcomes was assessed as an exploratory outcome. Results: In total, 88 patients were enrolled: 35 to the canakinumab arm, 35 to the canakinumab + pembrolizumab arm, and 18 to the pembrolizumab arm. One patient (2.9%) in the canakinumab arm (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.07-14.92), six patients (17.1%) in the canakinumab + pembrolizumab arm (95% CI: 6.56-33.65), and three patients (16.7%) in the pembrolizumab arm (95% CI: 3.58-41.42) achieved MPR. No unexpected safety signals were observed. Of the 84 patients (95.5%) who underwent operation, the prespecified 6-week window was achieved for 72 patients (85.7%). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant treatment with canakinumab alone or combined with pembrolizumab did not improve MPR rates compared with pembrolizumab alone. No unexpected safety signals were observed and canakinumab did not adversely affect surgical outcomes. Intraoperative perihilar or perilobular fibrosis after neoadjuvant immunotherapy was rare.

Indexed as

Monoclonal antibodiesNeoadjuvant treatmentNSCLC

Identifiers

PMID40810132
PMCPMC12343357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.