ReviewJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2025
Navigating liver toxicity in the age of novel oncological agents.
Review in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging Immune-Based Therapeutic Strategies in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026Review
- Trial design and end points in hepatocellular carcinoma: an EASL-AASLD-ILCA consensus statement.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Real-world evidence of ribociclib-induced hepatotoxicity in patients with breast cancer: a multi-center experience.BMC cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The advent of novel oncological therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, and protein kinase inhibitors, has revolutionised cancer treatment by significantly improving patient survival across a range of malignancies. However, these advances have been accompanied by the emergence of new and often unpredictable adverse events, among which hepatotoxicity represents a growing clinical challenge. In this review, we provide a comprehensive synthesis of current knowledge on liver injury associated with these three key classes of oncological agents, with a particular focus on mechanisms of action and hepatotoxicity, clinical presentation, and management strategies. Given the expanding use of these agents, both as monotherapies or in combination regimens, this topic is of pressing relevance to hepatologists and oncologists alike. As combination therapies become increasingly common, the complexity of drug-liver interactions and their implications for patient safety demand greater interdisciplinary awareness and collaboration. This review advocates for a pragmatic approach to the management of drug-induced liver injury in patients with cancer, underscoring the critical need to balance hepatic preservation with the imperative of maintaining oncological efficacy in this uniquely vulnerable population. By addressing an emerging area of clinical importance, we aim to stimulate further research on oncological hepatotoxicity, a phenomenon that is poised to become increasingly prevalent in routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.