ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2025
Long-term outcomes of dupilumab therapy in severe asthma: A retrospective, multicenter, real-world study.
Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dosing Interval Extension of Dupilumab in CRSwNP: Five-Year Real World Outcomes.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2026Article
- Long-Term Adherence to Benralizumab and Sustained Clinical Benefits in Patients with Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: Insights from GALERNA, a Retrospective Real-World Study in Spain.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dupilumab is an IL-4Rα antibody approved for treatment of severe asthma. Real-world data on the continuation and cessation patterns of dupilumab and long-term treatment efficacy are scarce. Objective: We sought to analyze real-world, long-term treatment outcomes and to evaluate trajectories of patients continuing or discontinuing dupilumab therapy over a 3-year period. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective, real-world cohort study included patients with severe asthma who started dupilumab before March 2021. Data on asthma control, medication, lung function, and annualized exacerbation rates were collected at baseline and 3, 12, and 36 months after initiation of dupilumab therapy. Asthma remission was assessed at 12 months and 36 months after dupilumab initiation. Results: Of 160 included patients, 95 patients (59%) continued dupilumab therapy for 36 months; 65 patients (41%) discontinued therapy after a median time of therapy of 8 months. Patients who continued dupilumab for 36 months had significant reductions in annual exacerbations (-1; Conclusions: Dupilumab represents an effective long-term treatment option for patients with severe asthma, with sustained treatment effects up to 36 months. Importantly, a relevant proportion of patients achieved remission in this pretreated population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.