Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40810084›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of oncology2025

Efficacy of Infliximab Versus Vedolizumab in the Management of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Shreya Shambhavi, Harmanjeet Singh, Ganesh Ramaprasad, Murod Khikmatov, Varun Vankeshwaram, Kumar Ashish, Carlos Valladares, Tanushree Bhatt, Seth D Cohen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. When Checkpoint Inhibitors Break Barriers: Mechanisms and Challenges of irAEs of the Skin, Gastrointestinal Tract, and Lung.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shreya ShambhaviRutgers Health/Community Medical Center, Toms River, NJ, USA.
Harmanjeet SinghMahatma Gandhi Memorial Medical College, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India.
Ganesh RamaprasadMary Washington Healthcare, Fredericksburg, VA, USA.
Murod KhikmatovDepartment of Medicine, Rowan-Virtua University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, NJ 08084, USA.
Varun VankeshwaramRutgers Health/Community Medical Center, Toms River, NJ, USA.
Kumar AshishNazareth Hospital, Trinity-Health Mid-Atlantic, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Carlos ValladaresRutgers Health/Community Medical Center, Toms River, NJ, USA.
Tanushree BhattHenry Ford St. John Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Seth D CohenRutgers Health/Community Medical Center, Toms River, NJ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can cause severe gastrointestinal immune-related adverse events (irAEs), often leading to treatment interruption and increased morbidity. Immune-mediated colitis (IMC) ranges from mild diarrhea to life-threatening colitis, sometimes requiring urgent intervention. While corticosteroids are the first-line treatment, selective immunosuppressive therapy (SIT) with either infliximab or vedolizumab is used for steroid-refractory or dependent cases. However, standardized practices are lacking, and treatment decisions are largely left to provider discretion. This study compares infliximab and vedolizumab for IMC, focusing on remission rates, recurrence, SIT dosing, and systemic steroid exposure duration. Methods: We identified six retrospective cohort studies that compared infliximab with vedolizumab in the treatment of IMC through a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and Web of Science in English from inception until October 2024. From the identified literature, we extracted pertinent data such as remission and recurrence of IMC. Pooled analysis and heterogeneity analysis were performed using R Studio version 4.4.1. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: A total of six studies with 645 patients were included. In ICI-associated colitis, vedolizumab was associated with lower recurrence rates (odds ratio (OR): 0.29, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.15 - 0.54) and shorter systemic steroid exposure (mean difference (MD): -16.88 days, 95% CI: -20.47 to -13.30) compared to infliximab. While vedolizumab showed improved remission, there was no statistically significant difference in remission rates between vedolizumab and infliximab monotherapy (OR: 3.16, 95% CI: 0.29 - 34.01). Remission was achieved with fewer doses of infliximab than vedolizumab (MD: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.09 - 2.22). The mean number of vedolizumab doses was 2.57 (raw mean score (MRAW): 2.57, 95% CI: 1.43 - 2.71), while the mean number of infliximab doses was 1.36 (MRAW: 1.36, 95% CI: 0.69 - 2.02). Conclusions: Among patients with ICI-induced colitis, vedolizumab demonstrated superiority over infliximab by being associated with lower rates of colitis recurrence and decreased systemic steroid exposure, although it required a higher number of doses compared to infliximab.

Indexed as

CTLA-4Immune-mediated colitisInfliximabPDL-1SteroidsVedolizumab

Identifiers

PMID40810084
PMCPMC12339259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.