Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40810008›Full record

ArticleToxicology reports2025

Assessment of heavy metal pollution and human health risk in the soil of selected tea plantations from southern Western Ghats, Tamil Nadu, India.

Eswaran Rangasamy, Muniasamy Muniyandi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eswaran RangasamyMarine Ecology and Conservation Laboratory, Department of Environmental Sciences, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641046, India.
Muniasamy MuniyandiMarine Ecology and Conservation Laboratory, Department of Environmental Sciences, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641046, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil pollution on agricultural land has become a significant concern in major tea-producing regions, including Tamil Nadu, a prominent tea-producing state in India. The excessive use of agrochemicals in tea plantations leads to soil contamination, which in turn pollutes tea plantation soil. Tea soil samples were collected in six different tea plantations in commercially important regions from Valparai (Coimbatore), Coonoor, Kundha, Kothagiri, Kattabettu, and Gudalur (Nilgiris), in Tamil Nadu, India. The samples were taken from depths of 0-25 cm across distances ranging from 0-250 m. These samples were digestion procedure followed AOAC method. To assess human health risks, both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic effects will be evaluated across three primary exposure pathways: ingestion, inhalation, and dermal contact. The study conducted in six major tea-cultivated soils. Five tea plantations' soil samples are highly contaminated with cadmium and at high risk. Geoaccumulation index shows cadmium strongly contaminated in Valparai, Coonoor, and extremely contaminated in Kundha, Kothagiri, and Ooty tea soil samples. The Total Cancer Risk (TCR) in the study area mainly ingestion route values: Cd (0.0000364-0.0000583), followed by Cr (0.0000293-0.0000468), As (0.0000105-0.0000168), and Ni (0.00000269-0.00000431) All the values were higher than USEPA's of 1 × 10

Indexed as

Heavy metalsHuman health riskSoil pollutionTea plantation

Identifiers

PMID40810008
PMCPMC12343469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.